Skip to main content

MAGIC TRICKS



When Prachanda’s channel ABC kept referring to the “dhandali” in this elections, including the fact the political representatives of various parties were not allowed to accompany the ballot boxes to the locations where they were stored, I suggested that this in fact may not be a fiction of the losing party’s imagination, but a concrete reality. It appeared strange to me none of the RPP factions, none of the ethnic parties, none of the Madhesh parties won in any significant way in this election, especially in light of the disillusionment the majority of the people felt with the big parties. The Maoists’s loss was understandable—but what about all the others? 

A relative of mine  got very irritated with me at this point, and said that sleigh-of-hand of any kind was impossible. It was an internationally observed elections, he said. The Army accompanied the ballot boxes to the counting stations. Any deception was simply impossible.

I asked if representatives of the political parties accompanied the ballot boxes into the trucks. He said that political parties representatives do go along on those trucks, and that the rooms are sealed overnight. “Its not that difficult to put five people to sleep, and have some storage in the floor of the truck with substitute ballot boxes,” I joked. “Don’t talk about these magic tricks to people outside, they will think you are totally nuts,” my abovementioned relative warned me. 

Of course, it appeared now that there was really no need for magic tricks. The ballot boxes were apparently in the trucks without any political party representatives to oversee them, and also left unattended overnight. Plenty of time for some sleigh of hand without needing to build elaborate, fake, ballot box holding storage in the floor of the trucks. 

Dr. Prakash Chandra Lohani also alleged fraud. According to this Kantipur report (http://www.ekantipur.com/the-kathmandu-post/2013/11/24/top-story/more-parties-claim-polls-were-unfair/256132.html), this is what he said:

“Our agents were not allowed to travel in vehicles that carried the ballot boxes,” senior Rastriya Prajatantra Party leader Prakash Chandra Lohani told the Post. In an opinion article in Kantipur Daily on Sunday, Lohani said the ballot boxes from his constituency were allowed to be kept under the Army without the presence of the party’s agents.

The article also mentions that Madhesi Janadhikar Forum-Nepal Chairman Upendra Yadav made similar claims. 

It appears, from reading various news reports from various parts of the country, that there might have been a concentrated effort to “help” the two major parties win through an overwhelming majority. 

Of course, the election process is intrinsically susceptible to fraud. Anybody who thinks voting reflects the will of the majority is fooling themselves. Primarily because there is no “majority” who thinks with such bloc mentality—in reality, people’s loyalties are probably more fractured, and if a true accounting were to be held, it would probably show a lot more minority opinions than this elections has made room for. 

For the majority of the people who did not vote (two-third of the Nepali population did not vote because they are not eligible for various reasons, or because they haven’t yet received the proper documents), the elections is a spectacle to be watched with cynicism and a sort of weary wisdom. “This is just a way for politicians to make money. Once the donors leave, these priorities will change, and all these issues will lose prominence,” one young man told me. 

The donors, however, are not leaving anytime soon. So until and unless some strong-willed Nepali leader shows up, willing to clean up the mess and impose a genuine leadership which benefits the people, it looks like the status quo is unlikely to change anytime soon.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Bitter Truth: Talat Abbasi's Bitter Gourds

The stories are small, but with a spicy aftertaste that could be from nowhere else but the subcontinent. Talat Abbasi's Bitter Gourd and Other Stories is a collection of nugget sized, delectable tales laid out, in typical desi fashion, amongst the detritus of social stratification, family ennui, economic marginalization and diaspora. Gently dousing her stories with a generous portion of irony and satire, the Karachi born writer brings to the fore the small hypocrisies and the mundane corruptions of everyday life in Pakistan. Whether dealing with a birdman or a poor relation, a rich widow or an immigrant mother, Ms. Abbasi touches the mythic heart that ticks besides all these caricatures. The ghostly narrative influence of Virginia Woolf, with a pinch of Victorian lit thrown in for good measure, is discernable, although most of the voices are centered around the "how kind, how kind" echoes of South Asia. The book starts, appropriately, with a story about a feudal patro

INTERVIEW: TOM ARENS

KHULA MANCH Tom Arens first came to Nepal in 1972 as the South Asian representative of World Neighbors, a small American INGO. He stayed for 28 years. He was one of the founding members of the Federation of NGOs. Arens talked with Sushma Joshi of the Nation Weekly about the changes he has seen in the development scene in Nepal, as well as his thoughts about the direction in which the nation should take in the coming years. What was Nepal like in 1972? When World Neighbors first started, we worked with The Nepal’s Women’s Organization and Paropakar. These were the only two established smaller NGOs. We started with small funds: $50,000-100,000 the first couple of years. The government was ambivalent about smaller non-profits, so we couldn’t get registered until 7 years later, when the Social Service Welfare Council was established. The Queen was the chair. The Council helped to give status to smaller non-profits and to facilitate our work. What was your first program? Our first program w

Milk and rice

Sushma Joshi I am the youngest of seven cousins. When we were little, we used to play lukamari , or hide-and-seek, games in the garden. My eldest cousin sister, taking pity on me, would allow me to be a dudh-bhat (milk and rice) during our games. A dudh-bhat is someone too young to play the game adequately, but the older children allow this young one to tag along and never be “outed” from the game because they might cry if made to leave. So this means you are endlessly in the game, even when in reality you should really be out. Of course, being the youngest means you may always retain the status of a dudh-bhat even when you do grow up. In Nepal, as we know all too well, the hierarchy of age allows the young some privileges, along with the old. It appears to me Madhav Kumar, even though he's lost the game twice in two elections, is being allowed to be the dudh-bhat by his wiser and more tolerant elders. He is allowed to be in the game endlessly even though in reality he should real