Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from December, 2001

A state of Emergency does not mean a suspension of human rights

EkChhin : MS-Nepal Newsletter Oct-Dec 2001 Print this page A state of Emergency does not mean a suspension of human rights - Sushma Joshi A state of Emergency usually leads to the suspension of certain constitutional rights. The Nepali government, by declaring a state of emergency, has suspended certain rights to freedom, including the rights to freedom of opinion and expression, the freedom to assemble peacefully and without arms, and the freedom to move throughout the country. News can be censored, and people can be detained if they are believed to be a danger to the country’s sovereignty. Like the United States of America, which recently suffered a terrorist attack, Nepal has imposed these measures to stop political instability. In the United States, hundreds of people, mostly poor immigrants from Pakistan and other countries, have been detained in secret locations after the World Trade Centers attack. President Bush recently signed an executive order, without Congressional authori