Skip to main content

Killing our Nagas


Kathmandu Post, Sunday, 2010/07/04

Every morning, on my way to work, I pass the Bishnumati river. From the turnoff from Kalimati, I can already smell the powerful stench of rotting offals from the wounded body of the water body. Like a dying snake it lies, surrounded by the filth of a city intent on smothering it with sewage. The water is dark black, like ink. Every day, I walk past that fetid stink. I can sense the entrails of buffaloes, the timbre of industrial chemicals, the fluffiness of dumped ice cream cones. Each time I decide to walk back from work, I curse myself for having forgotten, once again, what lies in wait for me. I hurry past, trying to hold my breath, but there is no escaping the causality of what my human actions have already done to this river. We have disrespected this life-giving force by covering it up with our shit. Astounding ignorance makes us use the artery of the city as a dumping site. This disrespect for nature, surely, will one day rear its head to strike this proud city.

Kathmandu is already paying a price for killing its rivers. One by one, we hunt them down—Bishnumati, Bagmati, Tukucha, Dhobikhola, all of them plundered and murdered through indifferent government action, non-existent municipal institutions, and the good urban life.

Illegal construction is a killer-the boundaries of rivers are slowly choked by concrete buildings. The detritus of civilisation do the rest. Near the Om Hospital, government bodies have decided to build a canal and let some water past the landfill, but the mud itself has become an archaeological dig of twentieth century artifacts—plastic bags stuffed with unidentified remains (my friend whispers about illegally aborted foetuses dragged out by dogs), tires, ripped and torn cement bags. Hundreds of feet of plastic mixes with what was once earth. Will water flow through this canal ever again? Do we care?

The Rig Veda is replete with hymns in praise of rivers. The Godavari, the Kaveri, the Narmada, the Ganga, the Yamuna, the Saraswoti. The names sound like goddesses. They are goddesses. They gushed down from the forehead of the Himalayas, ice-cold, washing away the heat and sweat of the sweltering plains. The Goddess of Wisdom, Saraswoti, had a river named after her. Now people don’t know where that river vanished to. Satellite imagery says the mighty river sunk into the ground and now traces of only its ghost remains. Other people say the Aryan migrants who brought the memory of that river left the material one behind where it originated, in Afghanistan. Whatever the story, the river no longer exists. And along with it, it took civilisations, communities, and maybe more wisdom than we will realise. There is confusion about the Rig Veda—was it, say some, the place where the idea of caste originated, leading to the horrific oppression of millions of people over thousands of years? But if you go back, say others, the first book makes no mention of caste. And then there are others who say the Purusa Stuti, inside the Rig Veda, is the first to use the metaphor of purusa, the man, with brahmans as its head, and shudras as its feet. But as one commentator

says so aptly: there was never any injunction in the book to treat feet with any less respect than the head. (Let

me say I don’t personally subscribe to either the head or the feet theory. You may say I can’t make head or tail out of this particular story.)

Our disembodied society also views the rivers as separate, rather than as part, of the social fabric. The rivers, instead of being an integral artery, are merely some polluted part to be cast to the margins. Unlike Jared Diamond, a public intellectual who’s gone back to find out why societies died out, and seen environmental collapse as the main reason for the extinction of established civilisations, we Nepalis believe that the dying rivers can merely be caste aside, like a snake’s sloughed off skin, and we can go on living our lives in the concrete jungle, fearing nothing. One after the other, we shall kill our rivers, watch them choke and die with the same indifference with which we watch our people die, whether of diarrhoea, or hunger, or suicide. A country which cannot feed its people, we justify, cannot really take care of its rivers. Can it?

On my way to work, a colleague reads out a story from the newspaper. He says that the people of his village can no longer get brides—because there is no water, parents won’t send their daughters there to be married. People drink milk instead of water. They go to Dhulikhel to take a bath. But surely people had no problems with water before? I ask. Yes, he said. They’d always lived there, they’d always had water. But now the sources are all drying out.

When we kill parts of our rivers, we forget how they are inextricably linked with each other—how a tiny vein of the Bagmati might feed a thirsting village somewhere downriver, how cutting off a watery vein here and a watery vein there, as we do with such indifference, may soon cause our green country to turn into a desert.

Scientists predict water shortages all over the subcontinent in the coming decades. Predictions are dire—millions may be without drinking water. We may have to use the same water management techniques as desert societies. Thirsty times have begun. In Dhankuta, an old man in a teashop told me six water-sources dried out in the last few years. How many of muhans across the country are now dry, a whisper of a bygone memory? Do we see how a river is connected, like artery to the heart, from gushing glacial river to the small tributaries to the water-muhans of small communities?

Killing snakes was forbidden in Vedic times. Snakes, myths said, were the embodiment of Nagas, serpent guardians of rivers and rains. They carried the elixir of immortality. When Nagas were protected, the monsoons arrived in time. In a book titled Delog, which I found in a Boudha bookstore, I read about a woman who travels to the realms beyond death, and returns to talk about it. Of the many stories she brings back is the story of a young girl wrapped in the agonising clutch of a giant black snake—this girl has killed a snake in a previous life, and now she is paying for her karmic sins.

Buddhist literature is so inventive and charming, I think condescendingly.

Only in the orange glow of evening, stumbling past the Bishnumati, I see with the clarity of imagination how that story is not so far off from our own reality—how the dying serpent of the Bishnumati rive, poisoned with our pitless ignorance, wraps around the

young, beautiful city, choking her in its agonised clutches. The city, proud and beautiful, is already wrapped in its sins, and paying the wages in its earthly hell. And we, in our blissful ignorance, don’t quite know it.

sansarmagazine@gmail.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Bitter Truth: Talat Abbasi's Bitter Gourds

The stories are small, but with a spicy aftertaste that could be from nowhere else but the subcontinent. Talat Abbasi's Bitter Gourd and Other Stories is a collection of nugget sized, delectable tales laid out, in typical desi fashion, amongst the detritus of social stratification, family ennui, economic marginalization and diaspora. Gently dousing her stories with a generous portion of irony and satire, the Karachi born writer brings to the fore the small hypocrisies and the mundane corruptions of everyday life in Pakistan. Whether dealing with a birdman or a poor relation, a rich widow or an immigrant mother, Ms. Abbasi touches the mythic heart that ticks besides all these caricatures. The ghostly narrative influence of Virginia Woolf, with a pinch of Victorian lit thrown in for good measure, is discernable, although most of the voices are centered around the "how kind, how kind" echoes of South Asia. The book starts, appropriately, with a story about a feudal patro

INTERVIEW: TOM ARENS

KHULA MANCH Tom Arens first came to Nepal in 1972 as the South Asian representative of World Neighbors, a small American INGO. He stayed for 28 years. He was one of the founding members of the Federation of NGOs. Arens talked with Sushma Joshi of the Nation Weekly about the changes he has seen in the development scene in Nepal, as well as his thoughts about the direction in which the nation should take in the coming years. What was Nepal like in 1972? When World Neighbors first started, we worked with The Nepal’s Women’s Organization and Paropakar. These were the only two established smaller NGOs. We started with small funds: $50,000-100,000 the first couple of years. The government was ambivalent about smaller non-profits, so we couldn’t get registered until 7 years later, when the Social Service Welfare Council was established. The Queen was the chair. The Council helped to give status to smaller non-profits and to facilitate our work. What was your first program? Our first program w

Milk and rice

Sushma Joshi I am the youngest of seven cousins. When we were little, we used to play lukamari , or hide-and-seek, games in the garden. My eldest cousin sister, taking pity on me, would allow me to be a dudh-bhat (milk and rice) during our games. A dudh-bhat is someone too young to play the game adequately, but the older children allow this young one to tag along and never be “outed” from the game because they might cry if made to leave. So this means you are endlessly in the game, even when in reality you should really be out. Of course, being the youngest means you may always retain the status of a dudh-bhat even when you do grow up. In Nepal, as we know all too well, the hierarchy of age allows the young some privileges, along with the old. It appears to me Madhav Kumar, even though he's lost the game twice in two elections, is being allowed to be the dudh-bhat by his wiser and more tolerant elders. He is allowed to be in the game endlessly even though in reality he should real